Taken from another blog post, the following outline is a good general starting point for most candidates. How much and what kind of preparation is necessary will depend a good deal on a candidate's specific background. Too many candidates dive into their preparation without so much as a basic structure and suffer in the end from patchy knowledge and blind spots. Planning is the most important aspect of preparation. However, for most candidates, quite a bit of work is required to get to that stage, and in all honesty, the extra value LOMS could add at that level of proficiency is dubious at best.Īfter discussing the pitfalls and shortcomings of LOMS, an effective plan of preparation is the utmost priority. A person already fluent in the relevant theory and fairly proficient at solving cases might find it useful to listen to Cheng's audio recordings of interviews. Once those fundamentals are understood, the radio might be useful to refine them - but not before. A structured approach to, at the very least, the basics of grammar and core vocabulary is necessary for success.
Imagine trying to learn a new language from scratch by only listening to radio shows from a country where the language is spoken - one wouldn't get very far.
#Victor chung loms how to
LOMS is rather useless for this core aspect of preparation hearing another candidates' attempt to solve cases is not a particularly effective way to learn how to solve the case to. Hearing another candidate can be a useful way to consolidate one's knowledge and skills, however, the important factor is to actually have the required knowledge and skills to begin with. While offering some solid foundations LOMS has a few shortcomings everybody should be aware of.
0 kommentar(er)
